FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

sequels as stand-alone works

I, as one rightly should, filter books by their covers.

If they catch my eye, by being pretty or intriguing, I will read that bashful text taking refuge on the book’s far side. If interest remains by my side, if it has not skipped merrily off (as it has so many times before), I will often scan a portion of the prose contained between those aesthetically pleasing covers. Yes, choosing a book can be a long, and arduous process. And, to be honest, many times you will be disappointed.

Often, I feel as if authors have not put as much thought into the book’s universe, or the characters’ histories, as I’d like seeking to explain it to their readers and themselves. My solution: skip the first book altogether.

I mean, sure, you may no know what’s going on, at first – or even later – but the universe will seem far more vast and detailed, and the characters far more complex.

The trick, I believe, is referencing past situations and events with as little elaboration as possible – allowing the reader’s imagination to spin off, fueled by wonderment and possibilities.


Unrelated, I made a three (or four) page comic, but it wasn’t very good, so I probably won’t post it.

 

Comments

  1. k says:

    You should post your comics so we can see it…!!!

  2. b says:

    haha but you’ve already seen it

  3. p says:

    I haven’t :'(

  4. b says:

    it’s not good enough to post, but maybe i can google talk the link to you?

  5. […] second of three or four. I read it first, as I sometimes do, and think it stands best alone. Full of action and crime and even bits of mexico.  Quick and easy […]

You must be logged in to post a comment.